Monday, December 15, 2008
On Corruption in American Society
For example, a vendor to the governmental agency buys the purchasing manager a lunch. Corruption? Convenience store offers free coffee to police officers in uniform. The cops get coffee, the store gets a stead stream of nearly free security. Corruption? Maybe. Politician offers to provide an appointment to a colleague if certain fundraising goals are met. Corruption? Maybe.
The twist on corruption in a well-functioning bureaucratic society like ours is that it is not very profitable for the average government employee. There is some self interest in accepting the free pen, but there is also just a huge passel of laziness and good intentions. I am reminded of the scene in Stranger than Fiction where the IRS auditor is offered some cookies. He is compelled to refuse them, and because of that he is an asshole.
I think 90% of all corruption allegations I have seen are either bogus or the result of technical violations of complex accounting rules like those listed above. The other 10%, involve clear fraud. For example, selling public benefits (i.e. I will make sure you qualify for food stamps if you pay me $500); Self dealing, such as giving lucrative contracts to yourself through a shell company while hiding your involvement. Clear fraud is usually perpetrated by people with a true criminal mentality, not lazy public servants.
So I suppose it remains to be seen whether the governor of Illinois was a fraud or just lazy. The political machine in Chicago is legendary, but I've seen too many "investigative reports" on things that I actually knew about.
Minor update
Friday, November 21, 2008
The End of Mandate Coverage
Right now it looks like he is also going to add a whole layer of middle management. I think that is a big mistake, but I guess he is just a bureaucrat and bureaucrats love meetings, and middle managers do nothing but make meetings for each other.
This will be the end of my coverage though, since today is my last day here. Soon I will be off in the great cold Midwest, and blog updates, if any, will probably be about what happens up there.
So goodbye Texas politics. You are a nasty beast, but you’ve grown on me.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
More Mandates
Everyone else is worrying about the possibility of staffing changes. New boss wants everyone to update their resume. The agency I work for is big enough that I find it difficult to believe new boss will read all these resumes. Still, I think it is a good idea and if I ever get elected to a position like that I will do it too. For one thing, it is a nice little reminder that even though staffing changes are unlikely, we will all work for new boss soon. For another thing, it is good for a lot of long-term employees who haven’t written a resume in fifteen years. Speaking as someone who just did it myself, it helps you think about what you do for a living, which in an agency like mine can change over time.
For some people, though, the resume is pretty short, about as long as their name. Yes, some of my co-workers have the opposite reaction to the new administration…they know the new boss already. There is talk that some people who are working the trenches right now could be elevated above their current bosses. It makes the current bosses think hard about how they treated their employees.
The rumors continue, and I continue closing cases in anticipation of leaving. It is a very interesting time, and I kind of wish I could stick around to see it through.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
How to apply for the Bar in Missouri
Here are some of the things I have to pay for:
- Pay $800 to file my application
- Pay $20 for certificates of good standing from Texas
- Pay $?? for a certified copy of my driving record
- Pay $20 for a certified copy of my birth certificate
- Pay ~$20 for a certified transcript of lawschool
- Maybe more fees.
I also have to:- Provide 10+ different references
- List every place I’ve lived since I was 18 (you try it, it is harder than you might think).
- List every job I’ve had and every period of unemployment for ten years
- Certify in several different ways that I am not a drunk or a drug addict
- Certify that I have never had a mental illness
- Get fingerprinted
- Certify lots more stuff.
I don’t fault them for it, but this is a pain in the ass. - Provide 10+ different references
Monday, November 10, 2008
Mandates Cont.
[Old guy] was the type of guy that just pissed off everyone. He had a particular kind of narcissistic idealism which pains me as a defense attorney. It was the sort of attitude that makes judges assess sanctions. [Old guy] is just too pig-headed to see when he’s on the losing end of an argument. I have memos from twenty years ago that are just wrong, because he thought it was “the right thing to do.” He also had a way of demeaning everyone around him while at the same time taking all credit personally for anything good that every happened. In other words, not the type of person who would thank the little people during the award ceremony.
So it appears, however, that [old guy] and new boss are friends, or at least they get along well enough that new person is bringing him on. The real question is in what capacity, though. If [old guy] is put in a position of power, it might be a good way to clear out the ranks. If I wasn’t already leaving, I would probably quit if I had to deal with [old guy] anywhere in my chain of reporting. I wouldn’t be the only one.
Politics is a bitch.
Thursday, November 06, 2008
Mandates
From what I can see, when you have a large professional staff, it would be lunacy to fire everyone. What may happen, however, is a major restructuring. That will not be as personal, but it may have drastic effects on the efficacy of the office to actually carry out its statutory mandate (as distinguished from its electoral mandate). If you work in a specialized field, it will be unwise for the new boss to move you out and put someone without those skills in your position. I feel comfortable that the new boss will realize that.
Once again, I am leaving my position for reasons unrelated to the election. Because I do not have a dog in this hunt, I think I can watch it with a lot more neutrality.
It’s gonna be fun.
Saturday, November 01, 2008
On Elections
Having spent a fair number of years now as a professional appointee of an elected official, I have to say that election years are a little different. For one thing, questions about who exactly you vote for takes on a new meaning. Here's a typical exchange:
Person A: “Who you gonna vote for?”
Person B: “I don't know. [Incumbent] is a pretty good boss, he basically stays out of our business. Still, [challenger] is a [party member], so I'm kind of torn.”
Person A: “I hear [challenger] likes a lot of memos.”
Person B: “Memos? I hate memos. I'm totally voting for [incumbent].”
Elections take on a new meaning when you are actually choosing your new boss, especially when there is a real probability that your new boss might just fire you “because.” You try not to be afraid of change, but that is easy for me to day. I'm still young (for my profession) and I don't have a big pension that is just a few years from a step-up.
At the same time, who else actually gets to vote for their new boss?
In the end, I did not vote at all for the race for my new boss. It helped that he or she will not be my new boss soon since I am resigning, but I also just couldn't decide. In the end, while I was staring at the little check boxes on the ballot, I just thought “someone else can do this” and left it blank.